On 25 March, Elmbridge Borough Council’s Planning Committee approved the outline application for Clouds Hill Farm by 8 votes to 5, with 1 abstention—despite approximately 850 formal objections from local residents. For many in the community, this outcome raises serious concerns about whether the strength of local opposition and previously expressed positions were fully reflected at the point of decision.

​

Objections presented through FEDORA focused on two critical issues: the release of Green Belt land and the site’s sustainability. These concerns were reinforced during the meeting, particularly in relation to poor connectivity. Department for Transport data places the site among the lowest-performing nationally for accessibility, especially for walking—raising fundamental questions about the suitability of the location for development of this scale.

​

While the proposal emphasises delivery of “affordable” housing and alignment with government housing targets, there is increasing concern that these targets are being applied without sufficient regard to local context. The scale and nature of the scheme appear misaligned with existing infrastructure, transport capacity, and the character of the area.

​

Equally concerning is the apparent lack of consideration for inclusiveness. The needs of disabled individuals have not been adequately addressed, and there is a clear disconnect between the proposed amenities, transport provision, and the social and economic realities of the intended affordable housing demographic. This raises broader questions about whether the development can genuinely support a balanced, accessible, and sustainable community.

​

Although approval is subject to mitigation measures—including a controlled pedestrian crossing near Danes Hill—there is a widely held view that these do not sufficiently address the underlying issues. Concerns expressed during the meeting about the risk of appeal, potential financial penalties, and loss of funding (including approximately £3m in CIL) appear to have influenced the decision; however, many residents believe these factors should not outweigh fundamental planning considerations.

In response, we are now actively initiating a judicial review. This is a crucial step to ensure that these significant concerns are properly examined through due process and not left unchallenged. However, the window to act is narrow, and the costs involved are substantial.

​

This is a pivotal moment for Oxshott. Without immediate financial support, the opportunity to challenge this decision may be lost. If you believe in protecting the integrity, accessibility, and long-term sustainability of our community, we urgently ask for your contribution to fund this action.

Your support now will determine whether these issues are fully and fairly considered.